Anti Corruption Bureau (ACB) produced charge-sheet against Sunil Kumar Gupta R/o Channi Himmat Jammu, then Executive Engineer PWD (R&B), Lakhdeep Singh Jamwal R/o Mishriwala Jammu, the then Assistant Accounts Officer in the office of Executive Engineer PWD among others for alleged corruption.
Chargesheet has also been produced against Chatter Singh Abdul Hamid, Mohd Haif, Farman Ali among others under section 5(1) (d) r/w 5(2) J&K PC Act Svt. 2006 & Section 120-B, 201 RPC before Court of Special Judge Anti-Corruption Udhampur.
The instant case was registered on the basis of outcome of verification conducted by VOJ (now ACB) into the allegations that XEN (R&B) Special Division Mahore has shown executed 162 works departmentally during financial year 2010-11 involving total amount of Rs 2,53,87,520/- without inviting any tenders, thereby defeating the purpose of rationality of rates and got works executed through professional contractors and made payment without deducting service tax.
During verification, information received from Executive Engineer R&B Special Sub Division, Mahore revealed that the works were executed departmentally on emergent basis through the agency whose land/houses were coming under the alignment of road constructed in the division. During the course of verification, it has been found that most of the works were found executed through Chatter Singh Abdul Hamid, Mohd Haif, Farman Ali who are regular contractors.
Verification further revealed that Ex-En R&B Special Sub Division Mahore Reasi namely Sunil Gupta had abused his official position and allotted the works amounting to Rs.2.53 crores approximately to contractors under the garb of departmental execution and further benefitted them by not deducting service tax while releasing payments in their favour.
Further investigation conducted by the Anti-Corruption Bureau Rajouri has established accused persons namely Sunil Gupta then XEN and Lakhdeep Singh then AAO of Special Sub Division PWD R&B Mahore by abuse of their official position and in furtherance of criminal conspiracy with each and with contractors named above had manipulated the official record and had not deliberately charged the service tax which was admissible @ 10% for their own pecuniary wrongful gain and have caused huge loss for an amount of Rs.18,23,396/ to the state exchequer.